UK Census 2011
DEALING WITH UK HOUSEHOLD 2011 CENSUS THE EASY WAY
You are not the occpier dont be fooled.dont fill it in.
O'CCUPIER. [from occupy.]
1. A possessor ; one who takes into his
possession.
2. One who follows any employment.
So are any of us in possession of your property?
What is the definition of possession?
Samuel Jackson Dictionary:
POSSE'SSION. [Possession, Fr. possessio, Lat.]
The state of owning or having in
one's own hands or power.
So are we in possession? No. If we have a council house purchased on a 120 year lease we are leaseholders. If we have a mortgage we are classified as tenants (go look at your mortgage document to verify this) or mortgagees. SO, WE ARE NOT OCCUPIERS. Return the piece of garbage 'NO CONTRACT RETURN TO SENDER' OR SHRED IT.
PLease post your vid of your census send a message that you are not sheeple to be counted herded or numbered be brave stand up against the corrupt government.
I'm so sure we should not participate in the census this year. make his VIRAL.
We are under lawful rebellion,
we should not be rules by a foreign power, as reiterated in our constitution, all data is collected for the USA military complex they the same ones that just murdered over a million muslims.
In December 2008 LOCKHEED MARTIN the 2nd biggest international arms dealer in the World was handed a £150 million contract by the Labour government to collect our private information.
Unsuprisingly this was not considered front page news and the dumb down nation blindly will comply..
Lockheed Martin is a private company that aside from manufacturing bombs, bomber jets, arms, and being riddled with over 50 charges of corruption and environmental damage, is also in charge of gathering US military intelligence, and carrying out interrogation techniques-including those implemented at Guantanamo Bay.
In addition Lockheed Martin can be forced to hand over our private data to the American government due to the Patriot Act.
I'm all for better representation and want to see resources being allocated to the communites that need them most.
But I for one will not support Lockheed Martin. There has to be a better way of collecting data than this, and our politicians should choose a more responsible approach.
You are not the occpier dont be fooled.dont fill it in.
O'CCUPIER. [from occupy.]
1. A possessor ; one who takes into his
possession.
2. One who follows any employment.
So are any of us in possession of your property?
What is the definition of possession?
Samuel Jackson Dictionary:
POSSE'SSION. [Possession, Fr. possessio, Lat.]
The state of owning or having in
one's own hands or power.
So are we in possession? No. If we have a council house purchased on a 120 year lease we are leaseholders. If we have a mortgage we are classified as tenants (go look at your mortgage document to verify this) or mortgagees. SO, WE ARE NOT OCCUPIERS. Return the piece of garbage 'NO CONTRACT RETURN TO SENDER' OR SHRED IT.
PLease post your vid of your census send a message that you are not sheeple to be counted herded or numbered be brave stand up against the corrupt government.
I'm so sure we should not participate in the census this year. make his VIRAL.
We are under lawful rebellion,
we should not be rules by a foreign power, as reiterated in our constitution, all data is collected for the USA military complex they the same ones that just murdered over a million muslims.
In December 2008 LOCKHEED MARTIN the 2nd biggest international arms dealer in the World was handed a £150 million contract by the Labour government to collect our private information.
Unsuprisingly this was not considered front page news and the dumb down nation blindly will comply..
Lockheed Martin is a private company that aside from manufacturing bombs, bomber jets, arms, and being riddled with over 50 charges of corruption and environmental damage, is also in charge of gathering US military intelligence, and carrying out interrogation techniques-including those implemented at Guantanamo Bay.
In addition Lockheed Martin can be forced to hand over our private data to the American government due to the Patriot Act.
I'm all for better representation and want to see resources being allocated to the communites that need them most.
But I for one will not support Lockheed Martin. There has to be a better way of collecting data than this, and our politicians should choose a more responsible approach.
A quick tally of census concerns
The Guardian, Saturday 12 March 2011
Article history
In your article (Will it be the return of the Jedi?, G2, 10 March), I want to clarify a point on confidentiality. No personal census information has been or will be provided to EU member states or EU institutions – only statistical tables and counts. No approved researchers will be able to see names or addresses or anything that might identify any person. A recently published independent review of census data security says: "The public can be assured that the information they provide to the 2011 census will be well protected and securely managed." The Office of National Statistics takes the security and confidentiality of personal census information extremely seriously.
Glen Watson
Census director, 2011 Census, ONS
• My copy of the 2011 census questionnaire warns if I supply false information I could face a fine. The form also states that "your personal information is protected by law. Census information is kept confidential for 100 years." This is the direct opposite of the truth. The Statistics and Registration Services Act 2007 enables, for the first time, raw data, ie data linked to specific and identifiable individuals, to be shared with, among others, other EU governments, the police, HMRC, the intelligence services and "approved researchers".
The Office of National Statistics keeps spinning the line in the media that they will not "volunteer" personal information, while refusing to acknowledge that under the new legislation it has no legal powers to refuse to share personal data, should it be demanded by the bodies listed in the act.
Nick Wray
Derby
• The census form states that the information gathered will be used to help plan and fund services like transport, education and health. Yet, if someone records that they are employed for as little as one hour a week – even if it is temporary or casual work – or if they are working unpaid in a family business, they are instructed to bypass the question asking if they are a student, looking after home or family, or are long-term disabled. This will seriously overvalue the number of "employed" people and under-record the number of students, older school pupils, home-builders, disabled people and carers; how can such skewed data be used for the accurate planning of education and health services?
Keith Stapylton
Bracknell, Berkshire
• I was surprised that Jon Henley's piece on the census omitted perhaps the most salient point of all – that it is being carried out by Lockheed Martin, manufacturer of weapons of death and destruction worldwide. We can be sure their products (cluster bombs et al) have ensured less people needing to be taken into account in some countries. With many others I will be refusing to make a census return and refer readers to your online coverage (19 February).
Philip Foxe
London
• The cost of the census is estimated at £482m and the US company, Lockheed Martin, is being given £150m to run it. All American companies are subject to the Patriot Act, which allows the government to have access to all data held. This could mean that the US government could hold access to all the detailed, personal data on any of us who complete their forms. This should be of great concern to us all.
Ann Bellingham
Newbridge, Cornwall
• The comprehensive character of the census questionnaire suffers from what seems the basic error of having no category for widowers in question 4. This question covers the status of the individual. The advice so far is to leave it blank for widowers – who therefore have no status.
Eric Jones
Cricklade, Wiltshire
• Is now the right time for all those who object to the census to stand up and be counted?
Philip Heselton
Hull
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/mar/12/quick-tally-of-census-concerns
The Guardian, Saturday 12 March 2011
Article history
In your article (Will it be the return of the Jedi?, G2, 10 March), I want to clarify a point on confidentiality. No personal census information has been or will be provided to EU member states or EU institutions – only statistical tables and counts. No approved researchers will be able to see names or addresses or anything that might identify any person. A recently published independent review of census data security says: "The public can be assured that the information they provide to the 2011 census will be well protected and securely managed." The Office of National Statistics takes the security and confidentiality of personal census information extremely seriously.
Glen Watson
Census director, 2011 Census, ONS
• My copy of the 2011 census questionnaire warns if I supply false information I could face a fine. The form also states that "your personal information is protected by law. Census information is kept confidential for 100 years." This is the direct opposite of the truth. The Statistics and Registration Services Act 2007 enables, for the first time, raw data, ie data linked to specific and identifiable individuals, to be shared with, among others, other EU governments, the police, HMRC, the intelligence services and "approved researchers".
The Office of National Statistics keeps spinning the line in the media that they will not "volunteer" personal information, while refusing to acknowledge that under the new legislation it has no legal powers to refuse to share personal data, should it be demanded by the bodies listed in the act.
Nick Wray
Derby
• The census form states that the information gathered will be used to help plan and fund services like transport, education and health. Yet, if someone records that they are employed for as little as one hour a week – even if it is temporary or casual work – or if they are working unpaid in a family business, they are instructed to bypass the question asking if they are a student, looking after home or family, or are long-term disabled. This will seriously overvalue the number of "employed" people and under-record the number of students, older school pupils, home-builders, disabled people and carers; how can such skewed data be used for the accurate planning of education and health services?
Keith Stapylton
Bracknell, Berkshire
• I was surprised that Jon Henley's piece on the census omitted perhaps the most salient point of all – that it is being carried out by Lockheed Martin, manufacturer of weapons of death and destruction worldwide. We can be sure their products (cluster bombs et al) have ensured less people needing to be taken into account in some countries. With many others I will be refusing to make a census return and refer readers to your online coverage (19 February).
Philip Foxe
London
• The cost of the census is estimated at £482m and the US company, Lockheed Martin, is being given £150m to run it. All American companies are subject to the Patriot Act, which allows the government to have access to all data held. This could mean that the US government could hold access to all the detailed, personal data on any of us who complete their forms. This should be of great concern to us all.
Ann Bellingham
Newbridge, Cornwall
• The comprehensive character of the census questionnaire suffers from what seems the basic error of having no category for widowers in question 4. This question covers the status of the individual. The advice so far is to leave it blank for widowers – who therefore have no status.
Eric Jones
Cricklade, Wiltshire
• Is now the right time for all those who object to the census to stand up and be counted?
Philip Heselton
Hull
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/mar/12/quick-tally-of-census-concerns
-
juzekbrona
- Emigrant
- Posty: 375
- Rejestracja: 11 lis 2009 02:37
Te, Stefan, a Ty czytałeś dokładnie pytania z formularza?
Więcej danych o sobie to Ty musisz podać każdemu g...nemu bankowi czy councilowi. O operatorach telefonii kom. nie wspomninając. Oraz każdej gówn...ej firmie w Necie.
A kupno biletu na Twojego ulubionego Wizzair'a?
A Twój FACEBOOK lub NASZA KLASA?
A każda aplikacja o gów...ny zasiłek?
Myslisz, że to idzie w kosmos?
Wypełnienie online zajęło mi 10 minut. Nikt nie żądał ode mnie więcej informacji, niż wiedzą o mnie sąsiedzi.
Ty co? Śledczy Monsanto? Czy współtwórca mgły nad Smoleńskiem.
Ja podaję swoje dane lub ich nie podaję. I sobie żyję jak chcę. I mam w odbycie to czy ktoś zna moje nazwisko i datę urodzenia czy nie.
Mój nr jest w Necie i w książce telefonicznej. A jak dzwoni firma ubezpieczeniowa czy inne g..no, to mówię 2 słowa: f... y...
Czy Ty rozumiesz pojęcie "narodowy spis powszechny"?
Miłej lektury Guardiana.
Polecam również Sunday Times. Tam duzo wkładek jest.
Więcej danych o sobie to Ty musisz podać każdemu g...nemu bankowi czy councilowi. O operatorach telefonii kom. nie wspomninając. Oraz każdej gówn...ej firmie w Necie.
A kupno biletu na Twojego ulubionego Wizzair'a?
A Twój FACEBOOK lub NASZA KLASA?
A każda aplikacja o gów...ny zasiłek?
Myslisz, że to idzie w kosmos?
Wypełnienie online zajęło mi 10 minut. Nikt nie żądał ode mnie więcej informacji, niż wiedzą o mnie sąsiedzi.
Ty co? Śledczy Monsanto? Czy współtwórca mgły nad Smoleńskiem.
Ja podaję swoje dane lub ich nie podaję. I sobie żyję jak chcę. I mam w odbycie to czy ktoś zna moje nazwisko i datę urodzenia czy nie.
Mój nr jest w Necie i w książce telefonicznej. A jak dzwoni firma ubezpieczeniowa czy inne g..no, to mówię 2 słowa: f... y...
Czy Ty rozumiesz pojęcie "narodowy spis powszechny"?
Miłej lektury Guardiana.
Polecam również Sunday Times. Tam duzo wkładek jest.
-
omnomnomnom
- Gastarbeiter
- Posty: 43
- Rejestracja: 16 sty 2011 22:55
Kto jest online
Użytkownicy przeglądający to forum: Obecnie na forum nie ma żadnego zarejestrowanego użytkownika. i 34 gości